- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:53:20 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=22937 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- I also propose to refine the rules for expressions that return booleans as follows: (a) allow a return type of S where S satisfies subtype(S, xs:boolean?) - which allows subtypes of xs:boolean as well as xs:boolean itself (b) allow "treat as xs:boolean" - again allowing subtypes I wonder whether we should also allow expressions that are statically known to return nodes? For example it seems unreasonable to disallow match="p[@status]" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 11:53:21 UTC