- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 12:28:21 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19004 --- Comment #9 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-09-28 12:28:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > ro-length primary format token is an error (spec change) > > > > (b) in the other cases where the regex is not matched (025, 026, 039), the > > implementation should fall back to a format token of "1". > > Surely where the regex isn't matched, you'd have to fall through to "Any other > format token...". Yes of course. But for the tests in question, although this technically leaves other options open, most processors might be expected to then take the path that says if the format token isn't recognized, treat it as "1". Technically the test should have a dependency, for example in the case of -039 that the implementation does not recognize xA as a format token. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 28 September 2012 12:28:22 UTC