W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2012

[Bug 18838] [APPLET] encoding becomes version in version declaration

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 01:42:36 +0000
Message-Id: <E1TDmpg-0003kX-Nn@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org

--- Comment #3 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2012-09-18 01:42:36 UTC ---
Note that an empty <xqx:versionDecl> is schema-valid, so the question of how
the (normative) XQueryX-to-XQuery stylesheet handles such a thing is
independent of whether the (non-normative) XQuery-to-XQueryX converter
generates such a thing.

re the XQuery-to-XQueryX converter:

The code doesn't say why it generates:

    <!-- encoding: "utf-8" -->

instead of:


(It's been doing so since the earliest version of the converter that I can
find, dated 2005-10-16.) I suspect it's because the encoding of the original
XQuery query isn't (or shouldn't be?) pertinent to the encoding of the
resulting XQueryX query. Of course, we don't require that the declared encoding
be correct ("since the encoding of a query may change as the query moves from
one environment to another"), so it wouldn't be wrong to include the

Personally, I think I'd prefer an <xqx:encoding> over a comment (or no
<xqx:versionDecl>), because the test suite has certain tests whose point is to
elicit XQST0087 (malformed encoding string), and the corresponding XQueryX
tests (generated by the converter) currently don't do so, because the offending
encoding string is in a comment.

re the XQueryX-to-XQuery stylesheet:

The XQueryX spec doesn't guarantee that the stylesheet will transform every
schema-valid XQueryX query into a valid XQuery query, so producing
    xquery ;
    (1 eq 1)
is not technically wrong. However, it is undesirable. Probably the stylesheet
should transform an empty <xqx:versionDecl> into the empty string, as you

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 September 2012 01:42:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:39 UTC