W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2012

[Bug 18403] Are there any optional functions in F&O 3.0?

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:23:52 +0000
Message-Id: <E1TBSJc-0007Wg-8z@jessica.w3.org>
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18403

Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
                 CC|                            |jim.melton@acm.org
         Resolution|                            |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> 2012-09-11 15:23:51 UTC ---
Conformance to F&O is specified in the document defining the host language
(e.g., XQuery), so it's not necessary to discuss such conformance issues in the
F&O spec itself.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 September 2012 15:23:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:45:49 UTC