- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:06:38 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
- Message-ID: <bug-19671-523-5xXYiqOSFl@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19671 Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |josh.spiegel@oracle.com --- Comment #3 from Josh Spiegel <josh.spiegel@oracle.com> --- A slight downside I see is that if the policy is changed to "accept", it becomes a little awkward if the 3.0 processor encounters a 1.0 labeled module using updates. Strictly speaking, I would expect it to raise an error as if updates do not exist until XQuery Update 3.0 goes REC. In the current spec, the bit that reads "... or attempt to process the module with an XQuery 1.0 processor. " handles this case cleanly. Switching to "accept" seems more tolerable if there very little chance that XQuery Update 3.0 will introduce a backwards incompatibility. On this same note, can we be sure that XQuery 4.0 won't introduce a backwards incompatibility with 3.0? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 29 October 2012 22:06:40 UTC