- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:39:27 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:39:32 UTC
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19559 --- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> --- We currently maintain a secondary catalog (an exceptions file) for this kind of thing - basically metadata that's particular to our own use of the test suite, with extra "private" information about how to run the tests - including tests that we don't (normally) run because they are resource hogs. Because this kind of detail is implementation-specific, I think that a local exceptions file is the right way to manage it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 24 October 2012 13:39:32 UTC