[Bug 19504] [QT3TS] instanceof139


--- Comment #11 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> ---

> Although the only place we use subtyping judgements in the standard (namely
> for higher-order functions) isn't important enough to justify special
> treatment of this case, I can see that an implementation wanting to use the
> same judgements for static type checking would want to "get this right", and
> it's reasonable to want to use the same rules for both cases.

Yes, that the problem I was encountering.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.

Received on Monday, 15 October 2012 10:19:51 UTC