- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:30:43 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19158 --- Comment #4 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-10-08 22:30:43 UTC --- I think the idea of a map:process() calling a user-supplied function with two arguments - key and value - makes good sense; effectively a mapping function applied to the entries in a map. I can't see a good use case for a "fold" (or accumulator) capability here, since the order of processing would be undefined, and aggregation across the entries in a map isn't an especially common use case. The flattened set of values could be achieved simply with map:process($map, function($k, $v){$v}) Conversion to an element structure would look like this: <xsl:function name="f:pair"> <xsl:param name="key"/> <xsl:param name="value"/> <pair key="{$key}" value="{$value}"/> </xsl:function> map:process($map, f:pair#2) Feels good. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 8 October 2012 22:30:44 UTC