- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 25 May 2012 13:56:17 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17188
Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |liam@w3.org
--- Comment #3 from Liam R E Quin <liam@w3.org> 2012-05-25 13:56:16 UTC ---
Darn, I'm checking how I tested them with BaseX. Well, testing wouldn't tell me
I had a wrong function name (the joys of paste) and maybe BaseX is more
tolerant..
We should have a separate test that makes sure functions that require QNames
don't also accept strings, e.g. function-lookup(function-lookup#0) should
presumably be an error. Or we should allow string (which I'd prefer I think)
although not function items :)
Well, I've committed the changes, thanks for the report!
If the test work now please close the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 25 May 2012 13:57:50 UTC