- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2012 20:23:39 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16948 Summary: [FO30] number() when the context item is a list Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Proposed Edited Recommendation Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Functions and Operators 3.0 AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Also applies to the XPath 2.0 functions and operators spec. It's not clear what happens when number() is called with no arguments, and the context item is a node whose typed value is a list containing more than one atomic value. The spec makes two conflicting statements: on the one hand, it says that number() is equivalent to number(.), in which case a type failure would occur because atomization delivers a value that does not match the required type of xs:anyAtomicType?. On the other hand, it says that if conversion of the context item to a double fails, the function returns NaN. I think the preferred solution is that number() behaves exactly like number(.), which means there is a possibility of a type error. Other functions whose argument defaults to the context item do not seem to have the same problem. Some of them do not atomize (for example name(), nilled()); others explicitly work on the string value of the node (normalize-space(), string-length()); while data() allows the result of atomizing to be a sequence. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Sunday, 6 May 2012 20:23:42 UTC