- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:34:46 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12534
Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ghislain.fourny@28msec.com
--- Comment #3 from Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> 2012-06-19 15:34:46 UTC ---
I think there are two features that characterize the use of "tree" in the DM:
1. "rooted": one node is designated to be the root (I am using the mathematical
meaning of root here).
2. "maximal"/"a connected component of the graph induced by dm:parent" and this
connected component happens to be a tree. In particular, it must include the
node that has dm:parent not set (the "root" with our meaning, and which is also
chosen to be the root of the tree with the mathematical meaning of bullet 1).
I believe it is the second bullet point which implies that subtrees are not
trees (but they would fulfill the first bullet point I think).
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 15:34:52 UTC