W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2012

[Bug 12534] [DM] Definition of 'tree' missing and apparently non-standard

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 15:34:46 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Sh0S6-0000Sq-R6@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12534

Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ghislain.fourny@28msec.com

--- Comment #3 from Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> 2012-06-19 15:34:46 UTC ---
I think there are two features that characterize the use of "tree" in the DM:

1. "rooted": one node is designated to be the root (I am using the mathematical
meaning of root here).

2. "maximal"/"a connected component of the graph induced by dm:parent" and this
connected component happens to be a tree. In particular, it must include the
node that has dm:parent not set (the "root" with our meaning, and which is also
chosen to be the root of the tree with the mathematical meaning of bullet 1).

I believe it is the second bullet point which implies that subtrees are not
trees (but they would fulfill the first bullet point I think).

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 June 2012 15:34:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:39 UTC