- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 16:27:33 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16104 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2012-06-12 16:27:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > (1) I think there should be a rule that the annotations on a variable or > function should have distinct names. Without such a rule, annotion assertions > don't seem to make much sense. We don't seem to have such a rule at the moment. The WG disagrees - it makes sense to allow multiple annotation assertions with the same name and different parameters. > (c) there is no corresponding error for function annotations. > > If we fix (1) above then we can write this as > > It is a static error [err:XQST0116] if the set of annotations on a function > declaration or variable declaration inlcudes both a %public and a %private > annotation. The WG disagrees. There are no annotation assertions for %public and %private. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 16:27:40 UTC