W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2012

[Bug 16583] [XQ30] Compatibility Claims

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:31:07 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Se6aB-0001KX-JW@jessica.w3.org>
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16583

Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mike@saxonica.com

--- Comment #5 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-06-11 15:31:07 UTC ---
>It is not always possible to use settings to give the same answer.  I'll try to
put a set of examples together to demonstrate this.

I think this is the crux of the matter. You've raised a number of test bugs,
Tim, that seem to have this belief at their heart. I'm looking forward to
seeing your examples. From my perspective (and it was I who introduced the
split between development-time base URI and deployment-time base URI, since
renamed), it is always possible to have the two base URIs the same, if only by
compiling source code in the location where the object code is deployed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 11 June 2012 15:31:18 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:39 UTC