W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > June 2012

[Bug 17181] [XPath 3.0] Terminology: "Restricted Union Type"

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2012 21:57:08 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1SckhY-0004A9-FP@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2012-06-07 21:57:08 UTC ---
Current thoughts:

1. I think this is editorial.
2. I think we can change the term any time we come up with a good one.
3. Maybe we should bite the bullet and choose a wordy but descriptive term?

[Definition: A *list-free and facet-free union type* is an XML Schema union
type that satisfies the following constraints: (1) {variety} is union, (2) the
{facets} property is empty, (3) no type in the transitive membership of the
union type has {variety} list, and (4) no type in the transitive membership of
the union type is a type with {variety} union having a non-empty {facets}

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 21:57:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:39 UTC