- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:03:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17281 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-06-01 11:03:55 UTC --- >I really do not like having fn:static-base-uri returning something which isn't the static base URI. It just leads to confusion. I agree wholeheartedly. That's why I resisted this choice of terminology. I would much prefer to call the two concepts "source location" and "deployment location" and have static-base-uri return the "deployment location". That far better reflects the original intent of the split. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 1 June 2012 11:03:58 UTC