- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 18:29:55 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14955
--- Comment #13 from Michael Dyck <jmdyck@ibiblio.org> 2012-07-23 18:29:55 UTC ---
At the face-to-face meeting today,
(1) There was some support and no objection to keeping tests where the results
are
implementation-dependent.
(2) Michael Kay indicated that the test-suite already has assertions that would
allow a test to accept any result.
(something like: "type is item()* or error is *")
However, both of those turned out to be moot with respect to the current bug,
because the WG decided to modify the spec to say that the handling of
comment-before-versiondecl is not entirely implementation-dependent, but rather
an implementation-dependent choice between raising a static error or ignoring
the comment.
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 July 2012 18:29:57 UTC