W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > July 2012

[Bug 18357] New: [XSLT 3.0] editorial bugs noted by Abel Braaksma

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:11:13 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-18357-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: [XSLT 3.0] editorial bugs noted by Abel Braaksma
           Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
           Version: Working drafts
          Platform: PC
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XSLT 3.0
        AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com
        ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org

>From the XSL WG mailing list:

Just one typo in a code segment, one editorial issue and one question:

1. Under 4.6, a code segment has a typo: Expressions such as (/)
instanceof document-node(element(invoice)) also require look-ahead as
far as the start-tag of the first element.

this should be [...] (/) instance of document-node(element(invoice)) [...]

2. There are references to XDM's is-idrefs, written as is-IDREF,
is-idref, is-idrefs, same for is-id, which is written as is-ID in two
occurrences. I'm not 100% sure (my XDM knowledge is not so up-to-date),
but I believe these should be is-idrefs and is-id respectively.

3. Under 18.3, the term incrementor function is introduced. I couldn't
find a definitive reference on this term in the internet. Is it a
"proper" term? Should it be "increment function"?


Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 July 2012 12:11:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:39 UTC