- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 12:11:13 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18357 Summary: [XSLT 3.0] editorial bugs noted by Abel Braaksma Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Working drafts Platform: PC OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XSLT 3.0 AssignedTo: mike@saxonica.com ReportedBy: mike@saxonica.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org >From the XSL WG mailing list: Just one typo in a code segment, one editorial issue and one question: 1. Under 4.6, a code segment has a typo: Expressions such as (/) instanceof document-node(element(invoice)) also require look-ahead as far as the start-tag of the first element. this should be [...] (/) instance of document-node(element(invoice)) [...] 2. There are references to XDM's is-idrefs, written as is-IDREF, is-idref, is-idrefs, same for is-id, which is written as is-ID in two occurrences. I'm not 100% sure (my XDM knowledge is not so up-to-date), but I believe these should be is-idrefs and is-id respectively. 3. Under 18.3, the term incrementor function is introduced. I couldn't find a definitive reference on this term in the internet. Is it a "proper" term? Should it be "increment function"? Cheers, Abel -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 23 July 2012 12:11:19 UTC