- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 13:58:31 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17707
--- Comment #3 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2012-07-06 13:58:31 UTC ---
This test was written following the examples for fn:doc. See for example:
<test-case name="K2-SeqDocFunc-4">
<description> Invoke fn:doc with a relative, Unix-like URI. Since it's
relative, and the base-uri may be undefined, XPST0001 is allowed.
</description>
<created by="Frans Englich" on="2007-11-26"/>
<test>doc("/example.com/example.org/does/not/exist/doesNotExist/works-mod.xml")</test>
<result>
<any-of>
<error code="FODC0002"/>
<error code="XPST0001"/>
</any-of>
</result>
</test-case>
While I see your point, I'm not inclined to change the expected result unless
all tests expecting XPST0001 are reviewed. And if it were to be changed, to
what code would you suggest?
--
Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 6 July 2012 13:58:32 UTC