- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 17:16:05 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15547 --- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-01-13 17:16:05 UTC --- I don't think the current text says anything which would allow you to infer that these types are in-scope. The mere fact that an instance document carries a type annotation doesn't make the name of that type available at compile time. We could choose to make these type names "built in" so that they are always in-scope, but we don't currently do so, I think. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 13 January 2012 17:20:11 UTC