- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2012 15:31:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15317 Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sokolov@falutin.net --- Comment #2 from Mike Sokolov <sokolov@falutin.net> 2012-01-03 15:31:23 UTC --- More use cases: 1) Test for the existence of a binary document. This is useful when processing documents with references to image files. When they're not present (this often happens due to variances between copyright for print and for online distribution), the requirement may be to process the XML differently, eg by stripping all references to the images, including captions, etc. Currently trying to do this with doc-available fails - I forget why, but perhaps that can be patched up as an implementation issue. 2) Read in and write out a binary document unchanged, in an efficient manner (eg without the need to transcode to some text encoding). This would really be useful if it were also practical to process entire directories or archives (zip files, etc) in the context of xslt/xquery. At the moment we do directory processing externally, in Java, so this use case is mostly theoretical at the moment, for us. But it still could be useful to, say, pass every file in a folder through xslt, transforming uris on the way, and for the xml, also transforming the content. I think if this were to go forward, it'd be best to add a binary type to the XDM if there isn't one already. Then it would be possible to call out to extension functions to perform binary processing as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 January 2012 15:31:25 UTC