- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:42:49 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15687 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2012-02-14 14:42:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > (In reply to comment #0) > > XQuery 3.0 states in 4.15 Annotations: > > > > !!! SNIP !!! it is an error for users to create annotations in the > > following reserved namespaces [err:XQST0045]: > > We will change this to: > > "it is an error for a user to declare a function or a variable with an > annotation in the following reserved namespaces, except for annotations defined > in the XQuery family of specifications." Ooops - that's oddly worded. "if a user declares a function or a variable with an annotation in the following reserved namespaces, the annotation must be defined in the XQuery family of specifications [err:TBD]. For instance, a function may be declared %fn:private, but not %fn:carrot. > > Similarly, I'm not clear whether the following (from QT£ test > > annotation-assertion-16) should expect XQST0045. > > > > () instance of %fn:x function(*) > > We will say: > > "it is an error to use an annotation in the following reserved namespaces, > except for annotations defined in the XQuery family of specifications." Make that: "it is an error to use an annotation assertion in the following reserved namespaces, except for annotation assertions defined in the XQuery family of specifications." -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 14:42:53 UTC