W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 15690] [XQ30] Annotations and function coercion

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:31:04 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RxITI-0006GL-6Q@jessica.w3.org>

John Snelson <john.snelson@marklogic.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |john.snelson@marklogic.com

--- Comment #1 from John Snelson <john.snelson@marklogic.com> 2012-02-14 13:31:03 UTC ---
I believe that the spec currently says that the function returned by function
coercion takes it's signature from the expected SequenceType. Since annotations
are part of that signature, I think that means that currently the spec says all
original annotations are dropped. So I think the spec is currently clear, but

I also think there's a problem here because we don't describe what to do if the
expected SequenceType has annotation assertions.

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2012 13:31:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:37 UTC