- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 23:04:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14932 --- Comment #10 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2012-02-13 23:04:56 UTC --- Jonathan's proposal (member-only): https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-query/2012Feb/0021.html >From today's minutes: DECIDED to accept Jonathan's proposal for resolving this with some modifications. Change "available resources" to "available text resources". Change the description of unparsed-text() to say it returns not "the resource" but "a string representation of the resource". We should note that there is no essential relationship between the sets of URIs accepted by the two functions unparsed-text() and doc() (a URI accepted by one may or may not be accepted by the other), and if a URI is accepted by both there is no essential relationship between the results (different resource representations are permitted by web architecture). We should also note that there are no constraints on the MIME type of the resource. Also unparsed-text() needs a similar section to the "Various aspects are implementation-defined" paragraph that currently exists for the doc() function. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 February 2012 23:05:00 UTC