W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > February 2012

[Bug 13445] test-group VersionProlog is a mess

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:45:37 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RvwPZ-0001cz-3Z@jessica.w3.org>

Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Eisenberg <andrew.eisenberg@us.ibm.com> 2012-02-10 19:45:34 UTC ---
> Is there any point having test cases with comment-before-versiondecl,
> when the resulting behaviour is implementation-dependent? (Do the
> results tell us anything?)

I agree that these test cases won't tell us anything with regards to our
specification. I would still leave them in the test suite. Every so often there
will be an implementation that hasn't prepared for this situation and ends
abnormally. Leaving these test cases in the test suite will help catch such

Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Friday, 10 February 2012 19:45:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:37 UTC