- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:01:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19881
Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ghislain.fourny@28msec.com
--- Comment #6 from Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> ---
Hi O'Neil,
You are right - the test cases *-ns correspond to the assumption that a given
feature (here, HOF) is not supported, and are hence marked with <dependency
type="feature" value="higherOrderFunctions" satisfied="false"/>.
If an implementation does not support HOF, it must run these tests to check
that it behaves appropriately for require-feature/prohibit-feature.
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks Sorin for the comprehensive list. I have made the changes and
> committed them to cvs.
>
> No change were made to the test-cases:
> require-higher-order-function-4-ns
> require-higher-order-function-9-ns
> prohibit-higher-order-function-4-ns
>
> According to the description of these the desired affect of switching off
> the HOF features in the implementation is that we expect an error.
>
> Just to note that some implementations, like ours, may not be able to switch
> of features externally! I think Ghislain should look at these test cases
> again.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:03:01 UTC