- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 14:01:30 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=19881 Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ghislain.fourny@28msec.com --- Comment #6 from Ghislain Fourny <ghislain.fourny@28msec.com> --- Hi O'Neil, You are right - the test cases *-ns correspond to the assumption that a given feature (here, HOF) is not supported, and are hence marked with <dependency type="feature" value="higherOrderFunctions" satisfied="false"/>. If an implementation does not support HOF, it must run these tests to check that it behaves appropriately for require-feature/prohibit-feature. (In reply to comment #3) > Thanks Sorin for the comprehensive list. I have made the changes and > committed them to cvs. > > No change were made to the test-cases: > require-higher-order-function-4-ns > require-higher-order-function-9-ns > prohibit-higher-order-function-4-ns > > According to the description of these the desired affect of switching off > the HOF features in the implementation is that we expect an error. > > Just to note that some implementations, like ours, may not be able to switch > of features externally! I think Ghislain should look at these test cases > again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 18 December 2012 14:03:01 UTC