- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 19:23:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20416 --- Comment #1 from Henry Zongaro <zongaro@ca.ibm.com> --- Thank you for pointing out those problems with the query I used to describe the behaviour of the item-separator serialization parameter. I think I was so focused on ensuring adjacent atomic values would be separated by the item separator, not spaces, that I failed to ensure that the item separator would be present between each pair of adjacent items. I think your proposed query is correct, but I'd like to take a closer look to ensure that it is. Regarding your last point that "Document construction removes document nodes so manually removing the document nodes is unnecessary," I agree. Looking at the history of that query in Serialization, it was introduced at a time when XQuery made it an error if the content of a document node constructor contained a document node. After that restriction was removed, I never noticed the query in this section could be simplified. Speaking for myself, not on behalf of the working groups. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 17 December 2012 19:24:01 UTC