- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2012 14:21:41 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20340
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #1 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> ---
I had a lot of trouble with this test because of the problems retaining precise
namespace information when you round-trip through serialization and parsing. In
the course of conversion I discovered some paths that weren't being tested, so
the new test is actually more extensive than the old. By expressing it as
assertions against the result tree, with no serialization and parsing involved,
I think we get a much clearer picture of exactly what the result tree is
supposed to look like. I spent a lot of time on it and I believe it's correct,
but of course it's open to challenge. One of the benefits of splitting it into
20 or 30 assertions is that we can have a focused debate on which ones are open
to dispute.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 11 December 2012 14:21:51 UTC