[Bug 13399] [XP 3.0] Constraints on Unions in SequenceType

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13399

Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2011-10-04 16:36:48 UTC ---
We decided that the two definitions are probably equivalent.

We also decided "restricted" is ambiguous in this terminology, as is
"urestricted" - looking for a better term.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 4 October 2011 16:36:50 UTC