W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 14840] [XDM 3.0] Function types in the type hierarchy diagram

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 07:48:30 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RSl5i-0003pS-DJ@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14840

Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jim.melton@acm.org

--- Comment #2 from Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> 2011-11-22 07:48:29 UTC ---
Thanks for this bug report.  I am the person stuck with updating the type
hierarchy diagram(s), so I need to better understand your report.  Are you
suggesting that the entire collection (of three) type hierarchy diagrams should
be omitted from the documents, or that only a part of diagram 1 should be
omitted?  I think you mean the latter, but it's not quite clear to me. 

If it's only the part of diagram 1 that deals with function items, I would be
grateful for your guidance about what should be done with the fact that
function(*) is, in fact, a kind of item, and that it has a great many subtypes.
 Depending on the extent of the changes you might suggest to the part of
diagram 1 dealing with function items, I may be able to handle it editorially. 

If your suggestion is to eliminate one or all of the diagrams, then I believe
that a WG decision is required. 

If you wish to change the title either of diagram 1 only or of all diagrams to
replace the word "hierarchy" with "lattice" or something similar, I also
believe that a WG decision is required.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2011 07:48:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:36 UTC