W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > November 2011

[Bug 14662] 2.3.2 Updating Annotation Assertion

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:02:31 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1RQKWt-00070U-Tr@jessica.w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14662

--- Comment #1 from John Snelson <john.snelson@marklogic.com> 2011-11-15 15:02:30 UTC ---
I need to use cases for why you want to match only an updating function. After
all, a simple function is just an updating function that happens to return an
empty pending update list.

I guess what I'm saying is that the only interesting case is "never returns a
pending update list". If you disagree, I'd like to see motivational use cases
so I can understand better.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2011 15:02:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:36 UTC