- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:39:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11585 --- Comment #6 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-11-01 20:38:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > The WG has consensus for the approach in comment #4 - we are leaving this open > for our consideration of conformance later. It seems unfortunate that a bug report which started with the aspiration to combine two optional features into one should instead result in them being divided into three... We should avoid proliferation of options if we want to achieve the goal of interoperability. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 20:41:15 UTC