- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 17:05:33 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11585 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2011-11-01 17:05:33 UTC --- How's this: Minimal Conformance does not require an implementation to support "declare construction preserve". We add an Optional Feature called "Construction Preserve". If "Construction Preserve" is not enabled, an error is raised if the user attempts to declare construction preserve. (We should probably combine this with one or more other features related to schema types - and we should have a NOTE that says that - but that's orthogonal, and we can decide how to bundle optional features later.) The feature name is "construction-preserve". This can be used in require-feature / prohibit-feature. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 1 November 2011 17:05:51 UTC