- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:55:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12535 --- Comment #4 from C. M. Sperberg-McQueen <cmsmcq@blackmesatech.com> 2011-05-31 23:55:56 UTC --- I am not sure whether comment 3 amounts to a suggestion that we adopt version B of my proposal in preference to version A, or to a suggestion that there is no need to change the text of the spec, because everyone who matters already knows what it means without needing to bother about little things like what the words mean. I think it's best if we try to write our specs so that readers of good will can wrest a coherent meaning from them without recourse either to oral tradition or to revelation. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 23:56:02 UTC