W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > May 2011

[Bug 11713] [XPath 3.0] Rules for union types

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 17:09:58 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1QHJ6k-0006Vb-Oy@jessica.w3.org>

Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2011-05-03 17:09:58 UTC ---
In today's telcon, we agreed to the solution in the original description,
modulo minor wording.

We also agreed that comment #1 shows errors that need to be fixed. At editorial
discretion, it may be done in one of the following ways:

1. Introduce a name for a union type that is directly derived from
xs:anySimpleType, and use a phrase like "atomic or XXX union type" throughout.

2. Introduce a name that covers atomic types and union types directly derived
from xs:anySimpleType, and use that name throughout.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 17:10:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:35 UTC