[Bug 11713] [XPath 3.0] Rules for union types


Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2011-05-03 17:09:58 UTC ---
In today's telcon, we agreed to the solution in the original description,
modulo minor wording.

We also agreed that comment #1 shows errors that need to be fixed. At editorial
discretion, it may be done in one of the following ways:

1. Introduce a name for a union type that is directly derived from
xs:anySimpleType, and use a phrase like "atomic or XXX union type" throughout.

2. Introduce a name that covers atomic types and union types directly derived
from xs:anySimpleType, and use that name throughout.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 17:10:00 UTC