- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 03 May 2011 17:09:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11713
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2011-05-03 17:09:58 UTC ---
In today's telcon, we agreed to the solution in the original description,
modulo minor wording.
We also agreed that comment #1 shows errors that need to be fixed. At editorial
discretion, it may be done in one of the following ways:
1. Introduce a name for a union type that is directly derived from
xs:anySimpleType, and use a phrase like "atomic or XXX union type" throughout.
2. Introduce a name that covers atomic types and union types directly derived
from xs:anySimpleType, and use that name throughout.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 17:10:00 UTC