- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:45:56 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13028 --- Comment #3 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2011-06-23 15:45:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Re your original point: No, the call to fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence() > introduced in the normalization rule ensures that the *core* replace expression > (which is the one to which the static typing rules pertain) doesn't have to > deal with document nodes. > > (The static type of the *argument* to fs:item-sequence-to-node-sequence() might > involve the document node type. It also might involve atomic types. Those > possibilities are handled by the static typing rules for that function.) Ah, of course - thanks. I'd still like Comment #1 to be considered by the WG. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 23 June 2011 15:45:59 UTC