- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:07:24 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9716
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-06-08 21:07:23 UTC ---
The minutes of the Prague F2F (March 2011) say:
Note: discussed ad nauseam. MoZ has action item to write up alternative
solutions for us to examine and select from.
We reviewed MoZ's email of 2 September 2010.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xsl-wg/2010Sep/0003.html (member-only)
We amended the proposal by replacing recursive-copy and recursive-skip by
shallow-copy and shallow-skip, respectively.
RESOLVED: approve proposal as amended.
The resolution is thus:
1. deep-copy
2. shallow-copy (ex "copy")
3. text-only-copy (ex "stringify")
4. shallow-skip (ex "discard")
5. deep-skip
6. fail (no change)
The draft has now been updated to reflect this resolution. David, if you are
satisfied with this resolution could you please close the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2011 21:07:30 UTC