- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 22:14:17 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13300
Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mike@saxonica.com
--- Comment #2 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2011-07-19 22:14:17 UTC ---
Jonathan, I think you have missed the point of the comment, which is that
upd:revalidate does not belong unambiguously to any particular module: it is
performed while committing a pending update list, which might include updates
generated from expressions in many different modules.
The other problem here is that we've moved to a situation where the in-scope
schema for a module is almost entirely implementation-defined - so long as it
includes as a minimum the components that are directly imported into the
module, it can include anything else the implementor chooses. This doesn't give
a high confidence in interoperability.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 22:14:23 UTC