- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2011 17:02:03 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13298
Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Severity|normal |trivial
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@gmail.com> 2011-07-19 17:02:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> In my opinion any of the two solutions in the end of my initial comment is
> good:
> 1. Remove all unnecessary productions or
> 2. Add the missing ones
I believe this is largely a matter of editorial taste. Accordingly, I am
marking this as editorial.
When the text is difficult to write without a clearly named production, it
makes sense to add such a production for the sake of the description of that
particular expression. If an expression can be clearly described without adding
such a production, there is no need to add one.
Jonathan
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 19 July 2011 17:02:09 UTC