- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:58:47 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11813 Summary: Clarification request for the Constr-cont-nsmode-5 test Product: XML Query Test Suite Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: XML Query Test Suite AssignedTo: benjie.nguyen@gmail.com ReportedBy: nbrinza@gmail.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org The XQTS contains tests Constr-cont-nsmode-5 through Constr-cont-nsmode-10 (without Constr-const-nsmode-9), which verify the conditions for raising XQTY0086 ( http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-30/#ERRXQTY0086 ). In brief, to raise the XQTY0086 error, the document needs to contain an item whose dynamic type is xs:QName or xs:NOTATION. This, in my opinion, requires that the input document by validated against a schema (in the case of these tests, atomic.xml should be validated against atomic.xsd). Hence, shouldn't these tests include an "import schema" statement? And as a consequence, moved to the XML Schema optional features category? While it is true that the XDM instance can have validation information without an explicit schema import statement (e.g. through implementation defined means), there are no provisions in the XQTS for indicating this should be done for these tests. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:58:49 UTC