W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > January 2011

[Bug 11813] New: Clarification request for the Constr-cont-nsmode-5 test

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:58:47 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-ID: <bug-11813-523@http.www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/>

           Summary: Clarification request for the Constr-cont-nsmode-5
           Product: XML Query Test Suite
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: XML Query Test Suite
        AssignedTo: benjie.nguyen@gmail.com
        ReportedBy: nbrinza@gmail.com
         QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org

The XQTS contains tests Constr-cont-nsmode-5 through Constr-cont-nsmode-10
(without Constr-const-nsmode-9), which verify the conditions for raising
XQTY0086 ( http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-30/#ERRXQTY0086 ). 

In brief, to raise the XQTY0086 error, the document needs to contain an item
whose dynamic type is xs:QName or xs:NOTATION. This, in my opinion, requires
that the input document by validated against a schema (in the case of these
tests, atomic.xml should be validated against atomic.xsd). 

Hence, shouldn't these tests include an "import schema" statement? And as a
consequence, moved to the XML Schema optional features category?

While it is true that the XDM instance can have validation information without
an explicit schema import statement (e.g. through implementation defined
means), there are no provisions in the XQTS for indicating this should be done
for these tests.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 19 January 2011 15:58:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:34 UTC