- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:43:58 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12144
Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Jim Melton <jim.melton@acm.org> 2011-02-24 02:43:58 UTC ---
Paul, there was some sympathy in the WGs for your concern about
non-intuitiveness. However, given that a change of that magnitude would cause
Full Text 1.0 to go back to Working Draft, we concluded that delaying
publication for yet another 18 to 24 months would do a greater dis-service to
the community at large. We've agreed to change FTNot-q6 so that it doesn't
provide such a non-intuitive query, thus reducing the visibility of the problem
(see, I'm being honest here!), but to defer consideration of a change to the
syntax and/or semantics until v.next of Full Text. We hope that this is
acceptable to you, even though it did not directly make the changes that you
might want in this version of the spec.
As soon as FTNot-q6 has been modified, we'll mark the bug RESOLVED, either with
a "FIXED" resolution or a "LATER" resolution. We hope you will be willing to
mark the bug CLOSED at that time.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2011 02:44:00 UTC