- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 15:24:28 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11821 --- Comment #14 from Paul J. Lucas <paul@lucasmail.org> 2011-02-08 15:24:28 UTC --- If the static options are indeed constants, then of course an implementation is free to optimize using that knowledge. This is no different than any other compiler for any other language. However, I don't see how optimization is a compelling argument against allowing dynamic values. Again, this is no different that SQL allowing the use of '?' in a prepared statement: SELECT * FROM EMPLOYEE WHERE ID = ? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 15:24:30 UTC