- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2011 15:27:00 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12115
Oliver Hallam <oliver@cbcl.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |oliver@cbcl.co.uk
Resolution| |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Oliver Hallam <oliver@cbcl.co.uk> 2011-04-05 15:27:00 UTC ---
I have checked through all the tests that Tim listed and agree that they are
all not valid XPath 2.0
A number of tests however are valid XPath 3.0, but since full text is not
defined on XPath 3.0 this should not be of significance:
FTOr-expr1
FTOr-expr2
FTAnd-expr1
FTAnd-expr2
FTMildNot-expr1 (and similarly FTMildNot-unconstrained-expr1)
FTWindow-sentences3 (and similarly FTWindow-sentences3)
FTDistance-badexprwords1
FTDistance-badexprwords2
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2011 15:27:06 UTC