http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12109 Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | --- Comment #2 from Tim Mills <tim@cbcl.co.uk> 2011-04-04 12:38:27 UTC --- While I'm happy with the response, I still think the text should make this explicit. There should at least be one example using stopwords not sandwiched between non-stopwords. Our implementation ignores stopwords at query time (i.e. they are handled in our implementation of matchTokenInfos). Where S is a stopword and C is a non-stopwor, we treat: S+ as a query matching no results. S* T+ S* as if the query were T* (i.e. strip head and teal stopwords) T+ S+ T+ as if the query were T+ .+ (for each S) T+ This interpretation allows us to pass the XQFTTS tests. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 12:38:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:35 UTC