- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:01:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10865
Summary: [XQuery11] Why do we allow implementations to declare
their own annotations in the fn namespace?
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Member-only Editors Drafts
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows NT
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: XQuery 1.1
AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
ReportedBy: oliver@cbcl.co.uk
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Group: XSLXQuery_WG
4.15 states:
mplementations can add their own annotations, which should not be in the fn
namespace.
Why does this say "should" and not "must".
If this is for forwards compatability, or compatibility with scripting/update
then should there not be a note stating this?
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 30 September 2010 16:01:24 UTC