- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:39:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10789
Summary: [XPath21] Example production rule needs updating
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Version: Member-only Editors Drafts
Platform: All
URL: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xqu
ery-11/html/xpath-21.html#id-introduction
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P4
Component: XPath 2.1
AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com
ReportedBy: andrew_coleman@uk.ibm.com
QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Group: XSLXQuery_WG
In the introduction, the syntax of production rules is explained using the
following example...
[57] FunctionCall ::= EQName ArgumentList
The explanatory text that follows this doesn't match the rule itself (because
rule 57 had changed since XPath 2.0). The text could be changed to match the
rule, but I think a better example is needed here to illustrate the concepts.
For example, rule 47 is a closer fit to the existing text...
[47] ArgumentList ::= "(" (Argument ("," Argument)*)? ")"
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 08:39:33 UTC