- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:39:32 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10789 Summary: [XPath21] Example production rule needs updating Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT Version: Member-only Editors Drafts Platform: All URL: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/qtspecs/specifications/xqu ery-11/html/xpath-21.html#id-introduction OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P4 Component: XPath 2.1 AssignedTo: jonathan.robie@redhat.com ReportedBy: andrew_coleman@uk.ibm.com QAContact: public-qt-comments@w3.org Group: XSLXQuery_WG In the introduction, the syntax of production rules is explained using the following example... [57] FunctionCall ::= EQName ArgumentList The explanatory text that follows this doesn't match the rule itself (because rule 57 had changed since XPath 2.0). The text could be changed to match the rule, but I think a better example is needed here to illustrate the concepts. For example, rule 47 is a closer fit to the existing text... [47] ArgumentList ::= "(" (Argument ("," Argument)*)? ")" -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2010 08:39:33 UTC