W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-qt-comments@w3.org > September 2010

[Bug 9257] The rules for when an implied namespace binding conflicts should be more precise

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 14:45:28 +0000
To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1Oy464-0006y4-29@jessica.w3.org>

--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com>  2010-09-21 14:45:26 ---
(In reply to comment #9)

I agree. I changed the text to:

However, if the namespace prefix of an attribute is absent, it is in
no namespace, and its implied namespace binding is not added to the namespace
bindings of its parent element. Therefore, an update operation can create such
an attribute in an element even though its implied namespace binding conflicts
with a namespace binding in the "namespaces" property of the element.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 21 September 2010 14:45:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 16:57:32 UTC