- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:26:51 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9069 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> 2010-09-14 16:26:50 --- The design question is how much capability/flexibility to provide given the limitations of the function call mechanism. For example, it's difficult to provide an effective way of passing parameters to the transformation (unless we add maps to the language, something which XSL WG is seriously discussing.) Would a simple R = transform(I, S) function be sufficient, where I is the principal source document, S the principal stylesheet module, and R the result document? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 14 September 2010 16:26:52 UTC