- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:02:37 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7860 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-11-11 16:02:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > If I've understood you correctly, I think that as a reader I would find it > quite confusing to have to read "AtomicType" as meaning "atomic type or union > type," but "atomic type" as meaning "atomic type." True. Perhaps AtomicOrUnionType would be better ... a bit long. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 11 November 2010 16:02:39 UTC