- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2010 08:54:17 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9069 --- Comment #16 from Adam Retter <adam@exist-db.org> 2010-11-02 08:54:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > I'm a little reluctant to go with a mechanism that allows string-valued > parameters, but not for example booleans or nodes. Although it might meet 80% > of use cases, we would be locked in to this design for all time and there's no > obvious way to extend it to meet 100% of the requirement. > > Another possibility - less simple but more general - would be to supply as a > parameter a function which maps parameter names to parameter values. So are you saying that such an example would make use of higher order functions? Perhaps like - Signature - fn:transform($node-tree as node()?, $stylesheet as item(), $parameters as function(*)?) as node()? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 2 November 2010 08:54:19 UTC