- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2010 17:43:18 +0000
- To: public-qt-comments@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9069 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Robie <jonathan.robie@redhat.com> 2010-11-01 17:43:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > I'm a little reluctant to go with a mechanism that allows string-valued > parameters, but not for example booleans or nodes. Although it might meet 80% > of use cases, we would be locked in to this design for all time and there's no > obvious way to extend it to meet 100% of the requirement. If we pass parameters in an XML instance, all of these requirements can be met. > Another possibility - less simple but more general - would be to supply as a > parameter a function which maps parameter names to parameter values. What advantages do a map or such functions have over an XML instance containing the parameter / value pairs? Both XQuery and XSLT can create XML instances very simply. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.
Received on Monday, 1 November 2010 17:43:19 UTC